From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>Not here. The PIE form *h2n.h1-ént- ws pronounced roughly
>> --- In email@example.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
>> > On 2007-03-14 13:26, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>> > > As I know Piotr, Sanskrit n. > a see *h2nh2-ti >
>> > > I don't see the vocalisation of n. in your example...
>> > The prevocalic development was different: *n.HV > *n.nV > Indic
>> anV, cf.
>> > *tn.h2ú- > tanú- 'thin'. Similarly, *r. and *l normally give Skt
>> r., but
>> > *r.HV/*l.HV > irV (or urV in labial environments), cf. *pl.h1ú- >
>> > (Av. pouru-, Gk. polú-).
>> > Piotr
>> Piotr, you try to tell me that the output of Skt n. is either a or
>> This is not true: the output of the Skt. n.,m. is Only aExcept of course in the acc.sg., where it is -am.