Re: Res: [tied] Etymology of Rome - h1rh1-em-/h1rh1-o:m-

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Sean Whalen <stlatos@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- alexandru_mg3 <alexandru_mg3@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > 'I detected' that we have a long u: in Latin
> > > hu:ma:nus
> > >
> > > If somebody can help me to correctly derived this
> > > word...
> > > It should be:
> > > *dHg^H-o:m-h3n- > hu:ma:nus
> >
> > PIE *ghdo:m > Pre-Latin *hu:m and then an adjective
> > was formed from the generalized nominative just as
> > *bho:r > fu:r >> fu:rti:vus.
> >
>
> Thanks, Sean to be on the same page, and to help me with this
> example...
>
> Marius
>

Sorry for the incomplete message:
Thanks, Sean to be on the same page, and to help me with this
example...but I still think that the initial d(H) is lost and we
deal only with g^H-o:m-

Marius