Re: Res: [tied] Etymology of Rome - h1romh-eh2 again

From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 47781
Date: 2007-03-10

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
<miguelc@...> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:41:04 -0000, "alexandru_mg3"
> <alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:
>
> >--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Wordingham" <richard@>
> >wrote:
> >> Miguel is right, though, in saying that compensation occurs at
the
> >> coda - the triggering changes occur after the vowel that gets
> >lengthened.
> >>
> >
> >I think Richard that you didn't read & understand completely my
> >posted pdf...
> >
>
> I think _you_ didn't read or understand the article you
> quoted.
=======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> miguelc@...
>

Really? So you are wrong , I show you that you are wrong, and it's me
that I didn't understand? It wouldn't be you, in this situation?

Remain to say that you didn't make any opposite assertion....Isn't it?

Miguel, it's not for the first time when you are wrong ...

I could count at least 4 times in our last 4 discussions
1. Timeframes of Romanian-Substatum 'Loans'
2. Etymology of Rom. 'aceasta'
3. Wrong etymology of k^lewos in Lithuanian
4. and now: wrong assumption "that considered impossible the
compensatory lenghtening based on the resyllabification (I have a
good memory:))

But seems that you have big problems (I remember and I will not
forget that you was able to reject my messages 'physically' in a
similar context) to recognize when you are wrong....

So if you want to be honest with yourself ok, if not, not: I will not
insist anymore...

Marius