Re: [tied] Re: Fun with prenasalized stops.txt

From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 47243
Date: 2007-02-04

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 11:38:28 -0000, "tgpedersen"
<tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Jens Elmegård Rasmussen <elme@...> wrote:
>>
>> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
>>
>> > Now, if this NVAsgDu *-nW was true, the condition that the
>> > o-variant of the thematic vowel appears before voiced consonant
>> > could be strengthened to 'before nasal', except for the
>> > troublesome Nsgm *-os. Jens has proposed that it was actually
>> > *-oz, with a unique /z/, but how about *-oNs?
>>
>> There would still be -o- before /y/ in the pronominal nom.pl. *tóy
>> and the optative *bhéro-yH1-t, and before /d/ in the neuter *tód.
>> Also, pronominal adverbs show *-o-dhi, *-o-bhi and *-o-r. We also
>> seem to have *-o- in the 1.du. *-o-we.
>
>
>The latter would be *-o-nWe in that case. *toy and *tod are composite,
>made up of *t- and *-oy and *-od

So what about *id, *k^id, *kWid (NAS n.sg.), respectively
*ey(-es), *k^ei(-es), *kWei(-es) (N m.pl.)?


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
miguelc@...