Re: [tied] Daimo:n 'Divider' <-> Bog 'Divider' too?

From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 46978
Date: 2007-01-16

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>
> On 2007-01-16 12:58, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > 1. If from Iranian, how many Iranians loans we have in Slavic
> > reflecting Slavic o < Iranian a ? Could you write a short list
please?
>
> It's the regular reflex (Slavic *o represents the merger of old *o
and *a).
>

I know, of course, this transformation. I have asked for similar
examples of such Iranians loans in Slavic reflecting Iranian a >
Slavic o (=>so loans older than sec V-VI max. : Sl. a > Sl. o)


> > 2. We have also
> > Tocharian B pa:ke, Tocharian A pa:k
>
> Also probably a loan from Middle Iranian.

So again we would deal here with a loan earlier than g > k in
Tocharian too...Do you know other Iranians loans in Tocharian
reflecting Iranian g > Tocharian k?


> > 3.If no h2 in the root, how you will explain the variants with
long
> > vowel /a:/ in the root : see Skt. ba:gá
>
> You mean <bHa:gá-> 'part, portion', don't you? It's the same
pattern as
> in <bHára-> vs. <bHa:rá-> 'burden, load' from *bHer- (no laryngeal
here!).
>
> Piotr
>

Yes. Thanks for the other example.
But maybe laryngeal on one side and no laryngeal on the other? Where
would be the contradiction?


Marius