Re: [tied] Subjunctive and Thematic Present

From: aquila_grande
Message: 45729
Date: 2006-08-15

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>
> Hittite has done as much restructuring as the other branches. Having
.........abandoned aspect distinctions.

Is this really so? Hittite had a lot of derivational endings that
could be placed between the root and the primary/secondary endings.
Many of these carried aspectual meaning, and some of them seemed to be
identical with some aspectual endings in the other branches.

Why could not such a freely usable set of aspectual endings be
regarded as the original one, and the more rigid aspectual system of
the rest of the branches as a later development.