From: Abdullah Konushevci
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Abdullah Konushevci"
> <akonushevci@> wrote:
> > On 4/20/06, Abdullah Konushevci <akonushevci@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In email@example.com, "alexandru_mg3"
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > 3.a Dacian *Akmo:nia 'Stony City' < PIE *h2ek'-mo:n-
> yo 'stony' /
> > > > h2ek'-mo:n- 'stone'
> > > > Preserved (not directly) in:
> > > > Albanian: kmesë 'sickle' < PAlb/Dacian? akmo:ntya: < PIE
> > > > tyeh2
> > > > Marius
> > > ************
> > > My view about Alb. <këmesë> is:
> > And I found it: Message 28115 confirms yours derivation exactly
> from it.
> I'm glad that 'you finally find out' that this is Beekes
> so at least now you 'can trust more' in it :).[AK]
> (also Huld proposed a similar one).
> d) against your supposed syncopation between k-V-m 'talks' the
> Albanian këmishë <-> Romanian kãmaSã < Latin camisia (< Celtic)
>Why only Vk-mV- could give an initial km- and did you have any other
> e) Also an initial cluster km- could not survive like this ...
> f) So only an initial cluster Vk-mV- could give an initial km- in
> >Note: Suffix -esë usually is added to verb roots: jetoj 'tolive',
> >buttya: ...
> But there is no suffix -esë here, Abdullah: is *-mo:n- + *-
> and the phonetic evolution of -esë in kmesë [-o:ntia: > entia: >Read abobe Orel's view.
> enca: > ens& > es&] > is similar to that one of pesë [-enc^a: > -
> enca: > -ens& > -es&]