From: tgpedersen
Message: 43490
Date: 2006-02-20
>you for the nice and very interesting summary.
> Torsten, I think Old Chinese is fairly straightforward but I thank
>a prefixing language.
> I am much more concerned about why Sino-Tibetan presents itself as
>the table.
> Any thoughts?
>
> It seems to be there is another, as yet unidentified "player" at
>I'd answer the question if I knew what it was.