Re: [tied] A "senseless" theory (philosophy of language)

On 2006-02-17 09:41, P&G wrote:

>>>references to "proto-nostratic" and "the first spoken word"...

> Of course occasional postings of that kind are no problem, but when almost
> all are like that, I wonder where the scientific base of our discussions has
> gone. I wonder, that is all ... and merely ask what others think.
>
> Peter

Well, What _I_ think, as a moderator, is that it's definitely high time
to terminate these off-topic ramblings. Nostratic-L is the right list to
discuss Nostratic on, and if anyone wants to discuss Proto-World and
"the first spoken word", how about starting a new forum for those
interested in the subject? Anyway, let's stick to IE questions here --
AND I MEAN IT. Thank's, Peter, for reminding me of my administrative duties.

Piotr