>"prto-language" for all of humanity
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mkelkar2003<mailto:smykelkar@...>
> To: Nostratic-L@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Nostratic-L@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:36 PM
> Subject: [Nostratic-L] Re: Why are Indo-Europeanist opposed to a
> --- In
> > I think the reason is probably because there's no convincing
> > that Proto-World ever existed.http://home.entouch.net/dmd/babel.htm<http://home.entouch.net/dmd/babel.htm>
>reconstructed monosyllables (Proto-Language) was "unlikely" to be
> M. kelkar
> Brian was challenged 16 hours ago to show where just one of my
>generalizations such as that made above by Etherman, Brian seems
> After his having made wide-reaching (but, apparently empty)
>There are two major flaws with your reconstruction of Proto-World.
> Inquiring minds want to know!