From: Richard Wordingham
>That much is true; this was largely meant as a warning about glibly
> At 4:18:22 PM on Sunday, February 5, 2006, Richard
> Wordingham wrote:
> > --- In email@example.com, "Brian M. Scott"
> > <BMScott@> wrote:
> > Some radar systems regularly search for and find signals
> > that are way below the level of noise.
> But under what circumstances? I'm no engineer, but I
> suspect that this requires knowing a good deal about the
> nature of at least the noise and quite possibly the signal
> as well, and probably not just qualitatively, either.
> It'sIt's probably not being applied numerically, but I'm not so sure we
> not clear that it's possible to have that kind of knowledge
> about language, and we certainly don't have it now.