Re: [tied] Re: Albanian pre and Romanian prada

From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 42378
Date: 2005-12-02

On 12/2/05, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
Abdullah Konushevci wrote:

> In Albanian it is a group of vowels and with, as I show, very high
> distribution. So, be it diphthong in Latin or not, it was treated in
> Albanian as a group of vowels.

Well, by the time Lat. ce:pa (thus, rather than <caepa>) and caelum were
borrowed into Albanian, the vowel was already Balkan Romance */e/ or
*/E/ and was treated accordingly in Albanian, /E/ being equated with
native *iƤ (<je>) and developing regularly into /ie/ in <qiell>. I can't
see a group of vowels in either case.

Piotr
 
I don't like to argue, but how do you explain in this case the Geg variant <kepa>: where do you see /ie/ that will couse probably palatalization of velar /k/ as it did in <qiella>, where probably we have to deal with diphthong. And, if we follow your explanation, why, for example, Alb. <nge> from <ngae> didn't couse also the palatalization of velar etc., etc.
 
Konushevci

SPONSORED LINKS
Online social science degree Social science course Social science degree
Social science education Bachelor of social science Social science major


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS