Re: [tied] Question on Albanian sy

alexandru_mg3 wrote:

> Piotr,
> a) the rothacism in fluier shows you that this word was present in
> Romanian Before Sec VI BC.
> b) Secondly e > je is much older...

IF it contains a rhotacised *l, and IF it contains an old e > je. How do
you know it does?

Piotr