--- david_russell_watson <
liberty@...> wrote:
> Anyone interested can check any of my posts to
> cybalist which
> might have been found objectionable, compare it to
> the post
> to which it was a response, and further compare the
> date of
> that post to the two in my paragraph above, and
> easily arrive
> at an idea of the proper division of blame due in
> this matter,
> I trust.
*****GK: You're absolutely right, David. The
moderators just didn't do their job properly, and when
you finally couldn't stand it and began to defend
yourself vigorously, you wound up in the same category
as your opponent. I have some sympathy for the
moderators (not much but some). I have a suggestion.
There are a few of them aren't there? Four? Five? I
realize it's a thankless job to keep track of non
-civility, and when everyone as a moderator has the
right and duty to do this, there is a tendency not to
do much. Why don't the moderators schedule their
activity, i.e. have A responsible during week 1, B
during week 2, C during week 3 etc. and then again.
And intervene instantly when there is a need. It's
worth trying. Anyway that's my opinion.****
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs