[tied] Re: Also an Austro-Asiatic Disconnect

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
wrote:

>
> I have no horse in this race but I cannot permit scientifically
> unsound ideas to be propagated without, at least, a challenge.
>
> Color (of skin, hair, and eyes) _is_ a genetically inherited
> feature.
>
> While only upper-class humans seem to take it into consideration
> when reproducing, traits like color are maintained and enhanced
> through scientific animal breeding.

And what exactly is the "scientifically sound" definition
of an "upper-class human"?

I have no doubt that you consider yourself one of these
creatures, but exactly upon what basis do you believe
that so?

I would have thought your name Irish, but who has ever
hear of an Irish nobleman, so what is it then?

Moreover, since it doesn't seem that you ever stick your
head out of your own house, I have to inform you that
within EVERY class, by whatever criteria that you define
a "class", there are individuals of VARIOUS tastes in
regard to racial features for the purpose of selecing a
partner for "reproducing".

> Francesco, I respect what you are contributing to the discussion
> in general but you must rid yourself of these out-of-date half-
> explanations.

Racism is out of date too.

Gods what a freaking lune you are!

David