[tied] Re: PIE voiceless aspirates

From: david_russell_watson
Message: 41944
Date: 2005-11-09

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "glen gordon" <glengordon01@...>
wrote:
> >
> > Since *woidos becomes /veda/ (the thing that you're
> > currently lacking) this absolute assertion is
> > obviously not correct.
>
> By the way, what form is *woidos? third imperfect?

He said that it's "the THING that you're lacking" and so
obviously intended a noun. With *woidos he clearly intends
the P.I.E. preform of Sanskrit 'vedah'.

David