Re: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)

--- mkelkar2003 <smykelkar@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh
> <gknysh@...> wrote:

GK: There are so many well-attested instances

> of
> > "invasions" (large, small, middling etc..) in
> human
> > history that the national-autochtonist position
>
> Calling an authochtonist position nationalistic is
> stereotyping the
> opponent to avoid answering them.

****GK: "national-autochtonism" is not "nationalism".
It refers to the notion that a particular ethnos or
nation considers itself "autochtonic". Capis
differentiam?*****


Whether or not

> his theory is
> correct Alinei is no Italian nationalist. Indeed
> autochtonism is the
> by *default* hypothesis.

****GK: There are no "default" hypotheses. Everything
must be proven.*****

Invasions and migrations,

> as the IEL now want
> to call them must be proven. Occam's razor applies
> here.

*****GK: How do you prove to me that my native
language (Ukrainian) ultimately derives from an "out
of India" migration? Apply Ockham's razor.*****





__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs