Re: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)

At 4:17:44 PM on Monday, October 31, 2005, mkelkar2003 wrote:

> I do not really care whether innovationst or
> traditionalist are being criticized by Smit and which side
> of the fence he is on. The quotation serves *MY* purpose
> about what should be to **ME**, the real purpose of
> historical linguistics.

Not in the sense in which it was meant, it doesn't; you had
to introduce all sorts of baggage of your own. Never mind;
I didn't really expect intellectual honesty. Nor do I
expect to waste any more time on this rubbish.

Brian