Re[2]: [tied] Slavic palatalistions: why /c^/, /c/?

At 9:45:11 AM on Saturday, October 22, 2005, tgpedersen
wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer
> <mcv@...> wrote:

>> The natural developments can be summarized as follows:

>> k -- t^ -- c -- þ -- t
>> \ \ \- s
>> \ \------ s
>> \
>> - c^ - s^ - s

> True, I was being sloppy. You need a k^ after k, though.
> And I'm not sure I agree with your t^> c^ (from Dutch?).

Old French: Latin /k/ before /a, au, e, i/ (e.g., carrum >
char, with k > t^ > c^ > s^).

Brian