From: Piotr Gasiorowski
> --- In email@example.com, "etherman23" <etherman23@...> wrote:The secondary /i/ from a vocalised laryngeal is of post-PIIr. origin and
>> Neither of these appear in Pokorny. Instead we have
>> kapati, an expected development from *kapeti.
> If the *k was unaspirated in InIr, we would expect zero-grade *cip-.
> This would probably be too divergent to be preserved in alternation
> with *kap-.