English / u/ > /V/ (was: Ie. *laywos/leh2iwos)

From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 40837
Date: 2005-09-28

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

> > It may have been a
> > capricious, incomplete sound change, like the lowering of Early
> Modern
> > English /u/, which took place in <butter> but not in <butcher>.

> Or dialect mixture?

It seems too regular for that to be significant. The environments
where the change did not occur are:

[b|p|f|w]_(t)S
[b|p|f|w]_l

There are some exceptional environments of the form [b|p|f|w]_lC where
the change does take place, (e.g. _bulge_), but the rule seems
complicated rather than prone to irregularities. The nearest to an
irregularity I can think of is _pulse_ (/V/) versus _fulsome_ /u/
but the latter is rather obviously a compound of _full_.

Richard.