[tied] Re: Ie. *laywos/leh2iwos (was: ka and k^a)

From: Rob
Message: 40810
Date: 2005-09-28

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> > >If you proposed instead *eN -> *aN -> *a, *oN -> *o, you could
> > >account for a/o ablaut.
> >
> > What a/o Ablaut?
> >
>
> Lat. mare, Slav. more etc.

IE *o and *a become Slavic *o. So there is no a/o Ablaut here.

- Rob