Re: [tied] PIE word for "people"

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 40643
Date: 2005-09-25

----- Original Message -----
From: "glen gordon" <glengordon01@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] PIE word for "people"


>
> Patrick rewords:
> > I was asking for a recognized source that had
> > *<ruma>, 'ford, bridge'.
>
> Then you should have said that. If that were your
> initial query, you'd be supported. In that case,
> you'd be correct in saying that such a translation
> is baseless, but I've already said that.
>
>
> > "More puerile jabs"? Is that not a puerile jab?
>
> A link showing information for others to benefit
> from is not a puerile jab. Your attack of others for
> questioning your ludicrous falsehoods is. Case in
> point.
>
>
> = gLeN

***
Patrick:

"Ludicrous falsehoods"? Another puerile jab.

***