Re: [tied] *kap-

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> perhaps it's kHoh3p- < *kHoph3-?

Correction: *kHoh3p- < *kHeph3-

Piotr

> But then we would expect the voicing of
> *p, as in *pi-ph3-e/o-, in non-metathesised forms, and you'd run into
> problems with Lat. ce:pi: (see below).