Re[2]: ka and k^a [was: [tied] *kW- "?"]

At 6:39:51 PM on Thursday, September 22, 2005, tgpedersen
wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, glen gordon
> <glengordon01@...> wrote:

>> Torsten:

>>> How about this: (Non-Anatolian) PIE is a trade language,
>>> [...]

>> How about this: Stop beating a dead horse. IE is not a
>> trading language for the reasons that have been repeated
>> a billion and one times before on this and other forums
>> on that subject of "trading languages".

> I must have missed that. PIEer's didn't trade?

'Trade language' and 'language spoken by people who do some
trading' are two very different things.

Brian