Re: ka and k^a [was: [tied] *kW- "?"]

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Wordingham"
<richard.wordingham@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> > There was a discussion of its origin a long time back. I was fairly
> > certain that it turned out to be a late import, but maybe I'm now
> > confusing it with the duck? I was going to refer you to L.V.Hayes'
> > Austric page, but it seems to be gone.
>
> If it was gone, it's back, e.g.
> http://home.att.net/~lvhayes/Langling/Glossary/glosspg1.htm . No need
> to panic!
>

Thanx, Richard. Google refused to find it. No goose though, and I can't
find anything sensitive about its genitic origin either. What does EIEC
have to say about its history with the PIEers?


Torsten