Re: ka and k^a [was: [tied] *kW- "?"]

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

> There was a discussion of its origin a long time back. I was fairly
> certain that it turned out to be a late import, but maybe I'm now
> confusing it with the duck? I was going to refer you to L.V.Hayes'
> Austric page, but it seems to be gone.

If it was gone, it's back, e.g.
http://home.att.net/~lvhayes/Langling/Glossary/glosspg1.htm . No need
to panic!

Richard.