Re: [tied] IE thematic presents and the origin of their thematic vo

From: tgpedersen
Message: 39867
Date: 2005-09-03

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "elmeras2000" <jer@...> wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, glen gordon <glengordon01@...>
wrote:
> >
> > So why not **sOwe:p- then? Why is *O doing an ad
> > hoc dosey-doh?
>
> I may be the right person to answer that. This is regular, for the
> infix consonant always does that: it moves from its original
prefix
> position to the position immediately following the initial
> consonantism of the root. Phrased otherwise, it moves to the
position
> immediately preceding the root vowel. Thus, *derk^- produces
*dork^-
> éye-ti, but *prek^- forms *prok^-éye-ti, all in accordance with
the
> original root form which was, then, in fact monosyllabic and
sometimes
> had an initial cluster.
>

Might one explain the movement of the prefix instead as a form of
vowel harmony and subsequent loss of prefix?


Torsten