[tied] Re: sum

From: tgpedersen
Message: 38568
Date: 2005-06-13

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, mkapovic@... wrote:
> Torsten:
>
> >> > If it's not directly from pre-proto-Slavic *sumi?
> >>
> >> It may be if you disregard everything we know about Slavic
> > linguistics.
> >>
> >
> > I assume you are referring to some subset of Slavic linguistics. I
> > wouldn't want to discard all those years of hard work. Which subset
> > is it?
>
> Just the well-established Slavic sound laws, nothing else...
>

They have no subsets? Can't be that many, then... ;-)


Torsten