Re: [tied] Re: *bhe-, -y, -w

On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 08:22:10 +0200, Piotr Gasiorowski
<gpiotr@...> wrote:

>Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>
>> Yes, the derived tenses of the perfectum look, with one
>> exception, exactly like inflected forms of the verb "to be"
>> added, in the "weak" verbs, to the *w-participle
>> (ptc.pf.act.):
>
>That's what Rix advocates for the -v-perfect and whatever derives from
>it:

I didn't know that. Do you happen to have the reference?

>an originally periphrastic tense with the *-wot/s- participle
>(converted into an -o-stem?) followed by (weak) inflected forms of 'to
>be'. Structurally (though with a different participle and a different
>auxiliary), it would be quite similar to the weak preterite in Germanic,
>if from the haplological reduction of
>
>3sg. *lubo:da(n) dede: > *lubo:de: (OE lufode, Goth. -o:da)
>3pl. *lubo:da(n) de:dun(d) > *lubo:de:dun (OE lufodon, Goth. -o:de:dun)
>
>Piotr
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...