Re: [tied] Re: Latin *accu ? - > or how to obtain the misising A

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 17:26:28 +0200, alex
<alxmoeller@...> wrote:

>It seems you stil did not got my idea. I repeat: "I am speaking about
>"a" as element of composita which does not arrive from Latin." This "a"
>has its certains function in Rom and these are:
>
>-old demonstrative which is to recognise in demonstrativa and locative
>adverbs , thus no Latin *accu
>-postposed definite article for feminine , thus no "ella > a"
>-dativ function,thus no Latin "ad" > "a"
>
>all these 3 aspects _are not of Latin origin_ ; all these 3 aspects are
>to find in Albanian too.
>Since you have Pokorny'S dictionary, I think you know which is the "a" I
>am speaking about. Normaly there shouldn't be any other questions to put
>but I am speaking trough my perspective. Maybe you stil have some open
>questions.

No. In fact I'm completely bored with all this nonsense.

From now on, if it's OK with the other moderators, posts
about why certain features of Romanian which, despite
looking exactly like being of Latin origin, are in fact of
Albanian, or Lithuanian, etc. origin, will be off-topic.

Consider yourself moderated.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...