Re: [tied] Re: Question regarding proto-albanian evolution of the P

From: alex
Message: 38092
Date: 2005-05-26

alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> Thanks a lot. So PIE *k't > PAlb *t.
>
> Are we sure that the intermediary stage was *kt?
> Is not better to suppose *ct in place?
>
> So maybe PAlb *acto:(ti) in place of *akto:(ti)?
>
> Thanks again,
> Marius


do you have some certain examples in mind here?
I suspect if the "k^" did not merged together with "k" forming one and
the same cluster "kt", then the output in "albanoid" words in Rom.
should be "sht" . The merging of "k^t" with "kt" should yeld of course
"pt".
However, ad hoc I don't recall any examples which should show this
change.

Alex




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.17 - Release Date: 25.05.2005