From: Piotr Gasiorowski
> 1. I agree here: Romania is an ordinary Romance language.I don't know if your count and the method of counting are correct (I
> But with some "difference" regarding your last appreciation:
> 1.a This "little local color" represented in Proto-Romanain
> Vocabulary (500-600AC) around 24% from the total Proto-Romanian
> vocabulary (and I talked here only about the 'preserved'
> I counted word by word Latin and Substratual words -> and I took
> into account only words with an Albanian counter-part.
> A quarter of the total vocabulary is not a "little local color".
> 1.b It deeply affect the structure of the phrase too.Perhaps, but just how deeply? There are some obvious "Balkan Sprachbund"