Re: [tied] Metathesis in sonant+ labiovelars, Greek

From: Joao S. Lopes
Message: 37097
Date: 2005-04-12

If this shift is normal (labial +o+sonant>u), why there is *bHoros > phoros, *gWHonos > phonos, *portH2- > portax, instead of *phyros, * phynos/khynos, *pyrtax ?
 
 
Joao SL

Sean Whalen <stlatos@...> wrote:

--- "Joao S. Lopes" <josimo70@...> wrote:
> Let me pick three words as example: nyx, onyx, lykos

> IE *n.kWt- > *nukt- > Greek nyx (nykt-) "night"
> IE *H3o-n.gWH- > *o-nugH- > Greek onyx (onykh-)
> "nail"
> IE *wl.kWos > *wluko- > Greek lykos "wolf"

> My question is:
> These shifts represent a regular trend in IE>Greek
> (sonant+labiovelar > sonant+u+velar) or may be loans
> from another IE language (but very close to Greek)

Are these your own reconstructions?  The oldest
posited forms above create misleading conclusions.  I
think it goes more like this:

nok^t-
nokt-
nukt-
nykt-

H3nogWh-
H3.nogWh-
onogWh-
onogh-
onugh-
onukh-
onykh-

H1ulkWo-
ulkWo-
lukWo-
luko-
lyko-

That is, there's only metathesis in lukos, but not the
kind you show.  The u in the other words comes from
rounding/raising of *o between certain consonants
(usually sonorant and/or round, as in onyma, gymnos-).


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!