From: Miguel Carrasquer
>> Allright. But that was only my subsidiary objection.It was in fact more an objection to the way these verbs are
>> What about Greek (and Balto-Slavic)?Oops, so I did. Typo. I meant (*-eih1-mi >) *-eih1-o:, of
>You said, about Greek, "thematized late to *-éh1i-o:".
>So what wouldThat makes no sense. The ye-verbs also have -joN, -iu. Why
>be wrong with *-eh1-yo:, the same as for Latin? I do not see such a
>great problem with Balto-Slavic: The infinitive-aorist has -e:-,
>which may be from *-eh1- of the aorist, the same as the Greek e:n-
>aorist. The present has -jo:, which fits Gk. khaíromai, Ved.
>já:yate, ON sitja quite well. A 1sg -jo: also goes with Baltic -i-
>in other types, and with Slavic -i- in other types, so both have