Re: [tied] Re: Lith. Z^em. obuolas 'apple' (was: Slavic compound wo

From: alex
Message: 35851
Date: 2005-01-06

Sergejus Tarasovas wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> What stem (*a:, i, e:, consonantal) are you interested in?
>>>
>>> Sergei
>>
>> all of them.
>
> *a:-stem.
> G.sg. -�s < -�:s
> D.sg. -ai
>
> e:-stem.
> G.sg. -e:~s
> D.sg. -ei
>
> i-stem.
> G.sg. -ie~s
> D.sg. -iai, former -ie
>
> C-stems
> G.sg. -s, former -es
> D.sg. (various analogical forms), former -ie
>
> Sergei


Thank you Sergei. I just wanted to compare with Rom. here since it appears
there are some similarities:

-� -stem
G/D.sg. -"-ei", former "-�i"; popular form is long(?) "-i"

-e -stem
G/D.sg. -"-ei", former "-ei"; popular form is long(?) "-i"

-ea -stem
G/D.sg. -"-lei", former "-u�i"; popular form is "-li"

The masc and neutra , all the stems (-�, -e, -i, -u, consonant) have the D/G
in "-lui".
The plural was generalisated for everything in D/G to "-lor".

I wanted to compare since it appears very dubious to me the existence of the
D/G forms with "-lVV" versus D/G forms without "l" (just VV) and there
appears we have the reminiscences of an older G/D system (these with -VV)
combined with a new G/D system formed with "-lVV". But of course, this what
surrescited my interess here is already away from the "apple" of the
topic:-))

Thank you once again.

Alex





--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 03.01.2005