Re: [tied] Re: angw/(h)i- 'snake, worm' -> and Albanian timeframes

alexandru_mg3 wrote:

> Alex Wrote:
>>> there is no "poroc^iti" but "poro~c^iti" (for ~ speaks the Romanain
>>> word "porunci") thus, the cluster "nc^" > "s".
>
> I fully agree (I don't know exactly the notation: o^ or o~ here)
> but in any case the Slavic form is *poro^c^iti so its not a simple o
> there...See Romanian 'porunci'.

for the Slavic nasal vowels "o" and "e" the notation here on Cybalist is
"o~" and "e~"

>
> The rule here is: Sl. *o^c^/*onc^ > Alb. *o^si > Alb. *osi.
>
> So we have the Sl. *nc^ cluster here that gave *s in Albanian and
> not a simple Sl. c^ > Alb s.
>

About "t�rsir�" . I considered this is to see compared with Rom. "toarcere"
but I agree, "t�rs�na" fits more better. For the Rom. word the Bulgarian
"t�rsina" does not fit. I cannot see how an Slavic "tir-" > "t�r" and how an
Slavic "sin" > "s�n". Probably the word should be traced back to a form as
"*tarsana" or "*t.rsana" with syllabic "r" for expalining "-�r" in "t�r".
The "a" in "s�n" should be requested by "�" and should be sustained by the
fact the "s" did not became "sh" as expected. It is possibly I am wrong with
my toughts but this Bulgarian word appears to be a loan from Romanian here.

Alex




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.6 - Release Date: 28.12.2004