Re: [tied] Re: Albanian origins and much more

g wrote:

> In #35545 the following are included along with the statement that
> they didn't have counterparts either in Albanian or in other
> language. Even the general dictionary, "DEX", which isn't a special
> etymological one, shows a different image:

< snip>

> George
>

in #35545 was mentioned as well:

"BTW, there have been several assumtions to bind some words to some Latin
words with the usual explanation of "semantic change". "

Alex