--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Sergejus Tarasovas"
<S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:
[reposting since some symbols got corrupted]
...
Eg., for die~vis^kas we have both G.sg.f. dievis^kõs (2x), G.pl.
dievis^kuN~ (3x) and G.sg.f. die~vis^kos (2x), for mer~gis^kas (<-
mergà (4)) both G.sg.f. mergis^kõs (5x) and G.sg.f. mer~gis^kos (2x),
mer~gis^komis (1x) (cf. also mer~gis^kai (1x), not +mergis^kai~).
...
Sergei