Re: [tied] Re: -st

From: alex
Message: 34908
Date: 2004-10-30

Kim Bastin wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 13:26:23 +0200, Alex wrote:
>
>
>> that is one of the very interesting roots for me since I cannot see
>> any phonetical dificulties for having the actually output in
>> Romanian direct from IE root without any Slavic influence. I think
>> here at the phonetic interdiction of having "s"+ "voiced" thus the
>> "s" became voiced as well.
>>
>> Any idea why should be the Rom. word "pizd�" a loan from Slavic? I
>> see none, at least no phoneticaly one.
>
> Most Vs[+voiced] > Latin V:[+voiced], as in ni:dus. So the above word
> cannot be inherited.
>
> Kim Bastin
>

sorry? what do I have to do with Latin here? I am speaking about an another
constelation:
Albanian, Romanian, Slavic; Latin lost no penny here.


Alex