Re: [tied] Bangani kentum forms

On 04-10-20 00:21, Harald Hammarström wrote:

> Dear all (esp. Jens, Miguel and Piotr),
> What is the latest on the interpretation on the validity on the Bangani
> kentum forms? I have been able to follow the story up to including Zollers
> unpublished response www.sai.uni-heidelberg.de/abt/MIND/zoller/Bangani.doc
> and the fact that Anvita Abbi and her students could substantiate Zoller's
> original findings incl. dOkru, gOsti, and lOktO (preliminary 1998).

That's all I know, too. I haven't heard of any recent progress as
regards the kentum substrate of Bangani.

Piotr