Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel

Jens:

> Hey, that's what I meant. Almost is good enough - if one language is
> almost that way, surely some prestage of PIE could theoretically
> also have been almost that way.

"Almost that way" is different from "completely that way" which was
your assertion beforehand. I can accept "almost that way" because that
was my point all along! So to paraphrase you more succinctly: "Yes,
gLeN, you were right here and I don't know why I resisted for so long."

Cool.


= gLeN