On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 20:08:40 -0700 (PDT),
enlil@... wrote:
>Miguel:
>> Another possibility, which occurs to me now, is that the
>> 2sg. marker was not lenited by analogical influence from (or
>> by re-affixation of) the free 2sg. personal pronoun *ti.
>
>The 2ps pronoun was *tu or *tun. The _plural_ was *ti or *tit.
In what language?
Eskimo-Aleut, as I said, has lost the original free
pronouns, but if we assume a common Uralo-Eskimo stage, they
must have been similar to the Uralic free pronouns, which
are PUralic *mi, *ti (oblique *mi-nä, *ti-nä; plural *m'äd
(or *m'än), *t'äd (or *t'än), oblique *m'äj, *t'äj).
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...