Re: [tied] Re: Old Czech hpán vs. Modern Czech pan, pán

From: P&G
Message: 33047
Date: 2004-06-03

> >p-ati 'master'
> >From pa:- 'to protect, govern'. That the /t/ in this word is
suffixal
> >is evident from its absence inGk. <despoina>.
> Burrows is wrong. There is no way *pot- can be derived from
> *poh3-.

Has Burrows overlooked the Greek potnia < *pot-niH, which is exactly cognate
with Vedic patni: ?

Peter