> On Wed, 26 May 2004 02:23:33 +0200 (MET DST), Jens Elmegaardparadigm that
> Rasmussen <jer@...> wrote:
> >> I simply prefer *wednós, *wedéni, because of the complete
> >> parallel with Vedic udnás, udén(i).
> >This will be reading an alternation into the graphics of a
> >do no show that. What is the basis of the assumption that thepresumed
> >cluster of /wedn-/ would be written with -te- and -ti-?It would be normal for it to be written *ú-(e-)id-na-(a-)as. It
> Standard Hittite orthographic practice. The cluster is
> written using signs that echo the preceding vowel (/linkta/
> = li-ni-kta, /walhzi/ = wa-al-ah-zi). How else could
> /wednas/ be written?