From: Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen
> Jens:So we are to rally around the wisdom of deriving idem from id + de:mum,
> > Why would anybody say "he (as) one thing", "she (as) one thing"
> Nevermind, I stick by my new analysis with /de:mum/. There is no
> **-em and I'm shocked that you would reconstruct something so inane.