[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "elmeras2000" <jer@...> wrote:

> > Could D. sg of o-stems also somehow be included into
> > the superlongvowel-theory? I don't see how but...
>
> It should if is from *-o: and has not been shortened by Leskien's
> law. It could the truth, but I would like to see some compelling
> evidence.

Like Lith. Z^em. ve.~lkô.u 'wolf' D.sg. vs. ve.~lkò. In.sg or East
Auks^t. (Gervé:c^iai) dzie~duo 'oldman' D.sg. vs. dziedù In.sg.?

Sergei