[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? - Clarification

From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 32006
Date: 2004-04-18

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 14:11:16 +0000, Richard Wordingham
> <richard.wordingham@...> wrote:

> >Incidentally, Y OWN-X-NOM looks a better way of motivating the
> >development of the PIE gentive plural *-om from the Nostratic *-b
> >nominal plural marker than the argument Miguel put forward in
> >his 'Tour of Nostratic Grammar'.
>
> Please explain.

Reply at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Nostratic-L/message/932 .