NumberAuthorDateTitle
Earlier messages
31900Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ2004-04-13Re: [tied] Demonstratives
31901Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31902Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-13Re: [tied] Demonstratives
31903P&G2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31904P&G2004-04-13Re: [tied] Demonstratives
31905Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-13Re: [tied] Arminius/Hermann
31906elmeras20002004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31907Mate Kapovic2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31908Mate Kapovic2004-04-13Re: [tied] Acc. plural of o- and eh2-stems (was: The disappearanceo
31909Mate Kapovic2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31910elmeras20002004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31911elmeras20002004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31912tgpedersen2004-04-14Re: [tied] Arminius/Hermann
31913Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-14Re: [tied] Arminius/Hermann
31914Mate Kapovic2004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31915loreto bagio2004-04-14Re: [tied] Santiago and James
31916loreto bagio2004-04-14Re: [tied] Santiago and James
31917Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31918Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31919Pere2004-04-14Re: [tied] Santiago and James
31920P&G2004-04-14Re: [tied] Santiago and James
31921g2004-04-14Re: Santiago and James
31922elmeras20002004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31923elmeras20002004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31924Joao2004-04-14Re: [tied] Santiago and James
31925Mate Kapovic2004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31926tgpedersen2004-04-15Re: Arminius/Hermann
31927tgpedersen2004-04-15Re: Whence Grimm?
31928Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-15Re: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann
31929elmeras20002004-04-15Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31930elmeras20002004-04-15Re: [tied] Acc. plural of o- and eh2-stems (was: The disappearanceo
31931george knysh2004-04-15Re: [tied] Snorri on "Odin's journey" [Was:Re: Whence Grimm?]
31932P&G2004-04-15Re: [tied] Re: Santiago and James
31933enlil@...2004-04-15Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31934enlil@...2004-04-15Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31935enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31936elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31937elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31938enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31939elmeras20002004-04-16[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31940enlil@...2004-04-16Re: Re[4]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31941enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31942enlil@...2004-04-16Re: Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31943enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31944enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31945enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31946enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31947Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31948Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31949Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31950Brian M. Scott2004-04-16Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31951enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31952enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31953enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31954enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31955enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31956enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31957Alvin Ekmekciu2004-04-16Re: Romanian-Albanian (a)
31958Abdullah Konushevci2004-04-16Re: Romanian-Albanian (a)
31959tgpedersen2004-04-16Snorri on "Odin's journey" [Was:Re: Whence Grimm?]
31960g2004-04-16Re: Romanian-Albanian (a)
31961tgpedersen2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31962tgpedersen2004-04-16[tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann
31963elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31964elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31965elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31966Abdullah Konushevci2004-04-16Re: Romanian-Albanian (a)
31967george knysh2004-04-16Re: [tied] Snorri on "Odin's journey" [Was:Re: Whence Grimm?]
31968elmeras20002004-04-16[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31969Brian M. Scott2004-04-16Re: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann
31970Richard Wordingham2004-04-16Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31971Joao2004-04-16German TH,
31972Richard Wordingham2004-04-16[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31973elmeras20002004-04-17[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31974george knysh2004-04-17Re: [tied] Snorri on "Odin's journey" [Was:Re: Whence Grimm?]
31975Brian M. Scott2004-04-17Re: [tied] German TH,
31976elmeras20002004-04-17[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31977Harald Hammarstrom2004-04-17Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31978ND2004-04-17Re: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann
31979Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-17Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31980Brian M. Scott2004-04-17Re[2]: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann
31981Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-17Re: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann
31982enlil@...2004-04-17Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31983enlil@...2004-04-17Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31984elmeras20002004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31985Richard Wordingham2004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31986enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31987enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31988enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31989enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31990enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31991enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31992enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31993P&G2004-04-18Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31994P&G2004-04-18Re: [tied] German TH,
31995elmeras20002004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31996elmeras20002004-04-18Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31997elmeras20002004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31998Abdullah Konushevci2004-04-18Re: Arminius/Hermann
31999Richard Wordingham2004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
Later messages