Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues

Me:

> Again, simple. It's just not true that any *s causes lengthening.
> This rule isn't dependent on phonetics. It's dependent on
> morphophonology.

Jens:

> How very true. That, however, is the same thing, only more
> complicated, and therefore more correct.

Well at least you admit that I'm more correct :)


= gLeN